← Back to PD Hub
Series 02 Β· GES Grizzlies PD

CKLA & the
Science of Reading

From phonemic awareness to knowledge-rich comprehension β€” the complete teacher preparation for GES's transition to Core Knowledge Language Arts, grounded in research that works.

Series Foundation

The Science of Reading & the CKLA Promise

This series prepares every GES teacher to understand why CKLA works, what it requires, and how to make the transition from Benchmark Advance with confidence.

πŸ’‘

The Director's Mandate

The DoWEA director cited the Mississippi Miracle and warned against learning the wrong lesson from it. Mississippi didn't just adopt phonics β€” they built a system-wide, sustained investment in educator capacity across the full literacy pipeline. That is exactly what this series is designed to build at GES.

πŸ”¬

The Science

Reading is NOT a natural process. The brain has no reading circuit β€” it must be explicitly built through systematic instruction. This is the foundational insight of 40 years of cognitive neuroscience.

πŸ“

The Model

Simple View: Reading = Decoding Γ— Language Comprehension. Both legs must be strong. CKLA builds both simultaneously β€” phonics in the Skills Strand, knowledge in the Knowledge Strand.

πŸ›οΈ

CKLA's Design

Core Knowledge Language Arts is the most research-aligned K–5 ELA program available. It is built on E.D. Hirsch's knowledge-gap research and integrates systematic phonics with coherent, cumulative domain knowledge.

CKLA Knowledge Domains by Grade

Kindergarten
Fables & Folktales
Animals & Habitats Β· Taking Care of Earth Β· Farms Β· Native Americans
Grade 1
Astronomy Β· Seasons & Weather
Animals & Habitats Β· Colonial America Β· War of 1812
Grade 2
Ancient Civilizations
Early World Civilizations Β· American Revolution Β· Westward Expansion
Grade 3
Greek Mythology Β· Civil War
Human Body Β· Astronomy Β· Native Americans: Southwest
Grades 4–5
Renaissance Β· Constitution
Industrial Revolution Β· Civil Rights Β· Ecology Β· Medieval History
⚠️

What This Is NOT

CKLA is not a phonics-only program. It is not a rejection of rich literature or student identity. It is not a scripted program teachers follow robotically. It is a coherent, cumulative knowledge-building system β€” the instructional equivalent of building a cathedral, one stone at a time.

Session 01 Β· 2 Hours

Why Reading Isn't Natural: The SoR Foundation

Teachers leave understanding the cognitive science case for explicit literacy instruction β€” and able to explain it to parents and colleagues.

SESSION 01 OF 04

The Brain, Reading & the Science We Know

⏱ 2 HoursπŸ‘₯ Whole Staff
Learning Objectives
  • Explain why reading must be explicitly taught (neurological basis)
  • Describe the Simple View of Reading and its two components
  • Identify where Benchmark Advance and CKLA differ in approach and why
  • Connect GES's literacy data to the SoR framework
TimeActivityDescriptionFormat
0:00–0:15LaunchThe Reading BrainShow Dehaene's "Reading in the Brain" adapted clip. Ask: "What surprises you?" Surface the core insight β€” reading is a technology overlaid on a brain built for language, not print. No child is born able to read.Whole group
0:15–0:35TeachSimple View of ReadingPresent the SVR equation: RC = D Γ— LC. Walk through what happens when Decoding is strong but Language Comprehension is weak (and vice versa). Use the "word caller" vs. "poor decoder" case studies. Teachers identify students they know who fit each profile.Whole group + pairs
0:35–0:55AnalyzeGES Data Through the SVR LensPrincipal shares anonymized GES literacy data. Teachers sort students into SVR quadrants: strong decoder + strong LC (on track), weak decoder (phonics-first need), weak LC (knowledge/vocabulary need), both weak (intensive). What does this tell us about our instruction?Grade-band groups
0:55–1:15CompareBenchmark Advance β†’ CKLASide-by-side comparison. What does BA do well? Where are the gaps? How does CKLA address those gaps? Specifically: knowledge strands, phonics scope, decodable text, oral language development. Not a criticism of BA β€” a transition conversation.Whole group
1:15–1:40ExploreGrade-Band: What Changes for Us?K: Focus on sound walls, decodables, phonemic awareness depth. Primary: How read-alouds become knowledge-building. Intermediate: Academic vocabulary as a comprehension driver. Each group maps their greatest instructional shift.Band groups
1:40–2:00CommitOne Change, Starting MondayEach teacher identifies one SoR-aligned practice to add immediately β€” even before CKLA arrives. Exit ticket: "I will ___ in my ___ class this week." Principal collects β€” these become coaching focus areas.Individual
🟀 Kindergarten
  • SVR in K: nearly all effort is on Decoding β€” phonemic awareness, letter-sound correspondence
  • Audit: how much of your literacy block is explicit phonics vs. incidental?
  • Sound Wall vs. Word Wall: understand the difference and why it matters
  • GES K data: where are your students in the phonemic awareness continuum?
🟣 Primary (1–2)
  • Transition moment: decoding plus language comprehension both matter now
  • Fluency as the bridge between decoding and comprehension
  • Read-alouds that build knowledge, not just "listening comprehension"
  • Where does your current instruction fall short on the LC leg of SVR?
πŸ”΅ Intermediate (3–5)
  • Most 3–5 gaps are LC gaps β€” vocabulary, background knowledge, syntax
  • The Matthew Effect: why rich get richer and poor get poorer in reading
  • CKLA's role in building the background knowledge that drives comprehension at 4–5
  • Academic vocabulary as a civil rights issue β€” who gets access to Tier 2/3 words?
Session 02 Β· 2 Hours

Phonics & Decoding: The Non-Negotiable Foundation

Systematic, explicit phonics is the most researched intervention in literacy education. This session makes every GES teacher fluent in phonics scope and sequence β€” regardless of grade or subject.

SESSION 02 OF 04

Systematic Phonics: Scope, Sequence & Sound Walls

⏱ 2 HoursπŸ”€ Practice-Heavy
Learning Objectives
  • Describe the CKLA phonics scope and sequence from PA through multisyllabic words
  • Distinguish between a sound wall and a word wall β€” and articulate the research case
  • Teach a phonemic awareness lesson using the explicit instruction framework
  • Identify common phonics misconceptions and how CKLA addresses them
TimeActivityDescriptionFormat
0:00–0:15LaunchCan YOU Hear the Sounds?Phoneme segmentation challenge for teachers: segment "strength" (/s/-/t/-/r/-/Ι›/-/Ε‹/-/k/-/ΞΈ/ = 7 phonemes). Most adults struggle. Discussion: if WE struggle, what does this tell us about how to teach it? Surface the complexity students face.Whole group
0:15–0:35TeachPhonics Scope & SequenceWalk the full CKLA K–5 phonics progression. Teachers annotate: "We currently teach this" / "This is new" / "This is deeper than we go." Key milestones: CVC words, blends, digraphs, long vowel patterns, multisyllabic decoding strategies.Whole group + annotation
0:35–0:55PracticeSound Walls: Build One TogetherEach grade-band group receives phoneme cards. Working together: sort phonemes, mount on vowel/consonant articulation chart. Discuss: why organized by mouth position, not alphabet? How does this change how students learn letter-sound relationships?Band groups
0:55–1:15ApplyTeach a PA LessonEach teacher scripts and delivers a 3-minute phonemic awareness micro-lesson (blending, segmenting, or manipulation). Partners provide feedback using the EI framework: was the I Do explicit? Did the teacher model the mouth position? Was CFU high-participation?Pairs
1:15–1:40AnalyzeDecodable vs. Leveled TextsSide-by-side comparison of a decodable reader and a leveled reader at the same approximate reading level. What words can a K student decode with explicit phonics training? What requires guessing? Discussion: what does leveled reading teach children to do?Trios β†’ whole
1:40–2:00PlanSound Wall CommitmentK and primary teachers plan their sound wall installation. Intermediate teachers plan vocabulary wall redesign using academic language principles. All teachers identify one phonics misconception they've been unintentionally teaching.Individual

CKLA Phonics Scope β€” Key Milestones by Grade

GradeMajor Phonics SkillsSpecial Focus in CKLA
KindergartenLetter-sound correspondence (26 basic sounds), CVC words, blending 3-phoneme words, digraphs (sh, ch, th, wh)Extensive phonemic awareness BEFORE print; articulatory feedback; sound wall from day one
Grade 1Long vowel patterns (CVCe, vowel teams), blends (bl, cr, str), r-controlled vowels (-ar, -er, -ir, -or, -ur)Decodable texts aligned exactly to taught patterns; no sight words before decoding
Grade 2Vowel diphthongs (oi, oy, ou, ow), advanced vowel teams (igh, -tion, -ture), multisyllabic decoding strategiesSpelling explicitly tied to phonics; encoding reinforces decoding
Grades 3–5Morphology (prefixes, suffixes, Latin/Greek roots), syllable types, multisyllabic word analysisVocabulary instruction through morphology; knowledge-building texts provide context for advanced decoding
Session 03 Β· 2 Hours

Knowledge-Building: The Hidden Engine of Comprehension

The single biggest insight from SoR research: comprehension is not a skill β€” it is a function of knowledge. CKLA is designed specifically to close the knowledge gap that drives reading failure.

SESSION 03 OF 04

Knowledge-Rich Literacy: Why What You Know Determines What You Read

⏱ 2 HoursπŸ›οΈ Content-Heavy
Learning Objectives
  • Explain the relationship between background knowledge and reading comprehension using research evidence
  • Describe how CKLA's Knowledge Strand builds cumulative domain knowledge across K–5
  • Design a knowledge-building read-aloud sequence for an upcoming CKLA unit
  • Articulate the equity argument for knowledge-rich literacy instruction
TimeActivityDescriptionFormat
0:00–0:15LaunchThe Baseball StudyPresent Recht & Leslie (1988): poor readers with baseball knowledge outperformed strong readers without it on baseball-related comprehension. Discussion: what does this tell us about comprehension "strategies"? Is visualizing really a skill β€” or is it a product of knowledge?Whole group
0:15–0:30TeachThe Knowledge Gap ThesisPresent E.D. Hirsch's core argument (Natalie Wexler's "The Knowledge Gap"): American elementary schools spent 30 years teaching comprehension strategies in isolation β€” and it didn't work. Knowledge is what drives comprehension. CKLA was designed to fix this.Whole group
0:30–0:55ExamineCKLA Knowledge Strand Deep DiveGrade-band groups examine their grade's CKLA Knowledge Strand materials: read-alouds, domain introductions, vocabulary development. Identify: (1) what prior knowledge does each domain assume? (2) what knowledge does it build? (3) how does it connect to the next grade?Band groups
0:55–1:20PracticeKnowledge-Building Read-Aloud DesignEach group designs a 15-minute knowledge-building read-aloud sequence for one CKLA unit. Must include: pre-reading knowledge activation, read-aloud with vocabulary stops, knowledge check, and connection to future units. Share across bands β€” see the K–5 arc.Band groups β†’ gallery
1:20–1:40ExploreVocabulary: Tier 1, 2, 3 in CKLAExamine CKLA's vocabulary instruction approach. What makes Tier 2 words (sophisticated general vocabulary) different from Tier 3 (domain-specific)? How does CKLA teach both? Practice: identify and sort vocabulary from one unit. Design one Tier 2 vocabulary explicit lesson.Subject groups
1:40–2:00ConnectKnowledge β†’ EquityDiscussion: who benefits MOST from knowledge-rich curriculum? Why is CKLA an equity move, not just an academic one? Connection to our military families: students who move frequently need curriculum that doesn't assume local cultural knowledge. GES's demographic is CKLA's best argument.Whole group
🌟

The Equity Argument for GES

Military-connected children are among the most mobile students in the nation β€” averaging 6–9 school moves by age 18. A knowledge-rich, coherent curriculum like CKLA is the great equalizer: it doesn't depend on what happened at the last school. Every student gets the full knowledge sequence, every year.

Session 04 Β· 2 Hours

Comprehension, Writing & the Full CKLA Lesson Cycle

The final session integrates all four components β€” decoding, fluency, knowledge, and comprehension β€” into a coherent daily lesson rhythm that teachers can sustain.

SESSION 04 OF 04

The Complete CKLA Lesson: From Phonics to Paragraph

⏱ 2 Hours🏁 Culminating
Learning Objectives
  • Describe the daily lesson components of a CKLA Skills Strand lesson and Knowledge Strand lesson
  • Plan a full week of CKLA instruction aligned to scope and sequence
  • Explain how writing is integrated into CKLA as a reading-reinforcement tool
  • Set personal CKLA implementation goals with evidence checkpoints
TimeActivityDescriptionFormat
0:00–0:20WalkCKLA Implementation ShowcaseTeachers share one artifact from their SoR implementation since Session 1: a sound wall photo, a phonics lesson plan, a vocabulary lesson, student work. Gallery walk with "warm" and "wonder" sticky notes.Gallery
0:20–0:40TeachThe Daily CKLA Lesson StructureWalk through a complete Skills Strand lesson (K–2) and a Knowledge Strand lesson (all grades). Identify: warm-up, explicit teaching, guided practice, reading, comprehension questions, writing. Show video of a model CKLA lesson. Teachers annotate with EI labels.Whole group
0:40–1:05PlanWeek-Long Unit PlanningGrade-band groups plan one full week of CKLA instruction: Skills Strand + Knowledge Strand daily blocks, vocabulary targets, writing tasks, and CFU moments. Use provided CKLA scope and pacing guide. Principal circulates as a planning partner.Band groups
1:05–1:25ExploreWriting as Reading ReinforcementHow does CKLA use writing? It is not "creative writing" β€” it is encoding and evidence. Students write about what they've read in the Knowledge Strand. Students encode words from the Skills Strand. Examine sample CKLA writing tasks and student exemplars. Design one writing-from-reading task.Pairs β†’ whole
1:25–1:45Self-AssessCKLA Readiness Self-AssessmentTeachers complete the 4-domain CKLA readiness rubric: phonics knowledge, knowledge strand fluency, vocabulary instruction, writing integration. Set one 90-day goal. Identify the resource or support most needed.Individual
1:45–2:00CloseThe CKLA PromisePrincipal closes: "In 2027, every student at GES will receive a curriculum built on decades of research. Our job between now and then is to make sure we're ready. You are already further ahead than you know." Share the coaching plan for ongoing CKLA support.Whole group
Research Library

CKLA & SoR Resources

πŸ”¬ Foundational SoR Research

πŸ›οΈ CKLA Official Resources

πŸ“š Essential Books

🌟 The Mississippi Miracle