Planning support, station integration, Science of Reading alignment, and key resources for CKLA K–5. CKLA replaces Benchmark Advance beginning SY 2026–27 per DoWEA directive.
What Is CKLA?
Core Knowledge Language Arts (CKLA) is a K–5 ELA program built on the Science of Reading. It has two integrated strands: the Skills Strand — systematic, explicit phonics and decoding — and the Knowledge Strand — domain-based read-alouds that build vocabulary and world knowledge. Together they address both pillars of the Simple View of Reading: Decoding × Language Comprehension = Reading.
Key shift from Benchmark Advance: CKLA organizes ELA around knowledge domains (Ancient Egypt, the human body, early American history) rather than reading strategies as the primary structure. Students read to learn content — and that accumulated knowledge builds reading comprehension.
🔤 Skills Strand — Decoding & Encoding
Daily flow: Warm-up → New phonics lesson (I Do/We Do/You Do) → Decodable reader → Dictation
Texts: Fully decodable readers — only patterns already taught
Assessment: Regular skills checks → data drives Station A small groups
Critical rule: No MSV cueing. Students decode every word — no guessing from context
Station fit: Station A (teacher reteach by skill) · Station C (AAPS targeted intervention)
📚 Knowledge Strand — Read-Alouds & Writing
Daily flow: Teacher read-aloud of complex text → Guided discussion → Domain vocabulary → Written response
Texts: Complex literary and informational — often above independent reading level
HomogeneousSimilar skill level — teacher-led station
RandomCards, sticks, wheel — builds community
Tip: Station A groups should always be data-driven. Station B and C groups can rotate flexibly.
Classroom Tools
Exit Ticket Bank
Ready-to-use formative assessment prompts. Filter by subject, type, or grade level. Click any ticket to copy it into your lesson plan.
Classroom Resources
Differentiation Toolkit
Strategies, scaffolds, and extensions aligned to UDL principles for use across all three station types.
UDL Principle 1 — Multiple Means of Representation
📖 Provide text at multiple Lexile levels
🖼 Include visual supports — anchor charts, diagrams, models
🎧 Offer audio options — text-to-speech, recorded instructions
🌐 Activate background knowledge with previews and connections
🔤 Pre-teach tier 2 vocabulary before stations begin
UDL Principle 2 — Multiple Means of Action & Expression
✏ Offer written, verbal, or visual response options
🧱 Provide graphic organizers and note-taking frames
💻 Use technology as a tool — not just consumption
🎤 Allow oral response in addition to written
🧩 Break tasks into smaller, explicit steps
UDL Principle 3 — Multiple Means of Engagement
🎯 Offer choices within stations when possible
🌍 Connect to students' lives and cultural backgrounds
⏱ Vary pace — not all students need the full station time
🤝 Build collaborative skills explicitly before expecting them
✅ Make success criteria visible at each station
Scaffold vs. Modify — Know the Difference
Scaffold — supports access to grade-level content (temporary, designed to fade)
Modify — changes the standard itself (IEP-driven, documented)
🎯 Stations A/B/C should primarily use scaffolds — not modifications
📋 Modifications at stations must align to individual IEP goals
💬 When in doubt: "Same standard, different support."
Quick Scaffold Bank
Sentence Frames
Pre-written language structures for discussion, writing, and academic response
Graphic Organizers
Visual frames for text structure, compare/contrast, cause/effect, problem/solution
Word Banks
Key vocabulary at the station — reduces cognitive load for retrieval
Anchor Charts
Co-created reference charts posted at each station for independence
Chunked Text
Break passages into smaller sections with read-aloud or partner support
Manipulatives
Concrete objects for math — base ten, counters, fraction tiles, pattern blocks
Support Services
AAPS — Academic Achievement & Progress Support
Evidence-based intervention strategies, progress monitoring tools, MTSS alignment, and station planning resources for AAPS interventionists at GES.
The AAPS Role in Station Teaching
The AAPS interventionist owns Station C (Targeted Intervention) in the GES co-teaching model. This is not a helper role — it is a dedicated, data-driven instructional role. Station C should be designed around the AAPS teacher's specific intervention expertise and aligned to each student's MTSS tier plan.
Core principle: The AAPS station replaces pull-out time, not supplements it. Students receive their intervention within the classroom context, embedded in the lesson, with the grade-level standard as the anchor.
MTSS Tier Framework Quick Reference
Tier 1 — Core
All Students · ~80%
High-quality core instruction for all. AAPS supports Tier 1 by co-planning stations that embed evidence-based instructional strategies universally.
Small-group targeted intervention (3–5 students). AAPS leads Station C with a skill-specific focus, using validated Tier 2 programs and frequent progress monitoring.
Small Group (3–5)Bi-Weekly PMValidated Programs
Tier 3 — Intensive
Few Students · ~5%
Individualized, high-frequency intervention (1–3 students). AAPS may run Station C for these students exclusively, with daily progress monitoring and frequent plan adjustments.
Fact Fluency: Distributed practice (5 min daily) — not timed tests
Strategy Anchor Charts: Make ten, doubles, near doubles — posted at station
Error Analysis: "Find the mistake" — builds metacognition and precision
Word Problem Frames: "There are ___ groups of ___. How many in all?"
Part-Part-Whole: Graphic organizer for addition/subtraction relationships
Progress Monitoring Quick Reference
ELA Progress Monitoring
📊 DIBELS Next — ORF, NWF, PSF, LNF
📈 Running Records — accuracy + comprehension retell
📋 WCPM timed reads — 1-min passage
✏ Spelling inventories — feature analysis
📝 Retell rubric — 4-point scale
Math Progress Monitoring
📊 easyCBM — computation probes by grade
📈 Fact fluency probes — correct digits per minute
📋 CBM Math — mixed computation, concepts
✏ Error analysis logs — pattern identification
📝 Reveal Math "Are You Ready?" — pre-unit
Frequency by Tier
T1 3x/year universal screening
T2 Every 2 weeks minimum
T3 Weekly or more frequently
Data review: at every PLT meeting
Goal line: set at start of intervention
Designing an Effective Station C — AAPS Checklist
Before the Lesson
☐ Review latest PM data — what skill is the group targeting?
☐ Connect intervention skill to grade-level standard
☐ Prepare materials (manipulatives, decodable text, cards)
☐ Know each student's goal — not just the group's
☐ Co-plan opening and closing routine with GL teacher
☐ Prepare a data collection tool (tally, rubric, notes)
During the Station
☐ Open with a brief review (2 min) — connects to previous session
☐ Explicitly model the skill before students practice
☐ Provide immediate corrective feedback (not praise-only)
☐ Collect at least one data point per student per session
☐ Close with a success statement — "Today you practiced..."
☐ Signal readiness to rotate — don't abruptly stop mid-task
Language acquisition frameworks, sheltered instruction strategies, home language supports, and station design resources for multilingual learners at GES.
MLL Support in Station Teaching
At GES, MultiLanguage Learners bring rich linguistic assets that are a resource — not a deficit. Station teaching creates ideal conditions for MLL students because each station can embed language supports at the point of use, provide structured interaction, and honor students' home languages without singling them out.
Core principle: Language development and content learning happen simultaneously. Every station should be designed so that a student acquiring English can access the academic task AND grow their language — not wait until their language is "good enough" to participate.
WIDA Language Proficiency Levels — At-a-Glance
Level
Label
Student Can...
Station Support
1
Entering
Point, draw, sort, use home language, single words
Language frames: Differentiated by proficiency level — not one-size frames
Multilingual discussion: Allow home language use in partner talk; share out in English
📝 Language Objectives
Every lesson needs one: "Students will be able to [language function] using [vocabulary/structure]."
Language functions: Describe, compare, explain, justify, sequence, predict, retell
Post at station: Language objective visible on station card alongside content objective
Assess language: Note language growth separately from content mastery in data tracking
Honoring Home Languages at GES
In the Classroom
☐ Bilingual glossaries at every station (English + student's home language)
☐ Welcome words in students' languages posted in the room
☐ Books in home languages available in the classroom library
☐ Allow home language use during processing time — not a violation
☐ Celebrate linguistic knowledge: "How do you say this in German/Spanish/Korean?"
☐ Host Nation teacher as linguistic bridge — leverage this partnership
In Station Design
☐ Station directions in English AND at least one additional language
☐ Visual task cards — not text-only instructions
☐ Sentence frames differentiated by WIDA level
☐ Non-verbal response options (sorting, matching, drawing, circling)
☐ Audio support option when available (recorded directions)
☐ Partner strategically — same home language + proficient English speaker
IEP implementation, specially designed instruction, co-teaching roles, and station design resources for SPED case managers and co-teachers at GES.
The SPED Role in Station Teaching
SPED teachers are instructional leaders, not assistants. In the GES station model, the SPED case manager leads a station where Specially Designed Instruction (SDI) is delivered intentionally — not informally or incidentally. SDI is the only instruction that only a SPED teacher can deliver: it is designed around a student's unique needs, documented in the IEP, and distinct from regular accommodation or modification.
Core principle: Every student with an IEP has a right to SDI embedded in their instructional day. Station teaching is the vehicle; the SPED teacher's station is where it happens.
IEP at a Glance — Station Planning Reference
📋 Before Planning a Station
Review each student's Present Levels — what can they do now?
Identify annual goals targeted this unit — which ones align to this station?
Note accommodations required — extended time, preferential seating, read aloud
Identify any modifications — are alternate standards required?
Check related services schedule — coordinate with SLI/OT/PT timing
⚖ Accommodations vs. Modifications
Accommodation: Changes HOW a student accesses content — same standard, different access
Examples: Extended time, graphic organizer, text-to-speech, reduced writing demand
Modification: Changes WHAT a student is expected to learn — different standard
Examples: Reduced number of items, alternate text, different grade-level standard
SDI: Specialized methodology, content, or delivery that addresses the disability's impact
SDI Strategies by Disability Area
Learning Disabilities — Reading/Writing
Orton-Gillingham: Multisensory phonics — see, say, hear, write simultaneously
Wilson Reading: Structured literacy — phoneme segmentation to fluent reading
Explicit computation: Model → guided → independent with consistent format
Autism Spectrum Disorder
Visual schedules: Post station sequence with pictures — reduces transition anxiety
Priming: Preview station tasks the day before — reduces novelty stress
Social scripts: Explicit teaching of station social routines ("When I finish, I...")
Sensory considerations: Noise level, seating, materials — plan station environment
Attention / Executive Function
Task analysis: Break station task into 3–4 explicit numbered steps
Chunked time: Use timer with visual countdown — station length as 2–3 smaller tasks
Self-monitoring: Checkboxes or tracking sheet at station
Movement breaks: Build a brief movement into station transition protocol
Co-Teaching with SPED — Role Clarity Reminders
SPED Teacher Owns
☑ SDI delivery at Station C
☑ IEP goal progress monitoring during stations
☑ Accommodation implementation and documentation
☑ Co-planning input on how disability impacts learning
☑ Communication with families about IEP progress
☑ Input on student grouping and station placement
SPED Teacher Does NOT Do
✗ Float without a station or clear role
✗ Follow a student everywhere as a shadow
✗ Only manage behavior — not instruction
✗ Reteach what the GL teacher already taught
✗ Only serve students with IEPs — Station C benefits all
✗ Wait for GL teacher to plan before contributing
Targeted reading and language intervention strategies, structured literacy frameworks, and station integration tools for SLI specialists at GES.
The SLI Role in Station Teaching
The SLI specialist brings structured literacy expertise that grade-level teachers are not trained to deliver. At Station C, SLI teachers lead targeted language and literacy intervention using validated programs — explicit, systematic, and sequential. Their station is not supplemental reading practice; it is the specialized instruction that moves students who haven't responded to core instruction.
Core principle: SLI intervention is most powerful when it connects directly to what students are reading and writing in the classroom. Co-planning with the grade-level teacher ensures the intervention vocabulary and texts match the core curriculum.
Structured Literacy Framework
Structured Literacy is an umbrella term for approaches that are explicit, systematic, sequential, and multisensory. All SLI instruction at GES should follow these principles, regardless of the specific program used.
🎯
Explicit
Direct teaching of skills — nothing is left to discovery or inference
📐
Systematic
Follows a planned, logical sequence from simple to complex
🔗
Sequential
Each skill builds on the previous — no gaps, no skipping
✋
Multisensory
See it, say it, hear it, write it — simultaneously
SLI Skill Scope — Station Planning by Area
Phonemic Awareness Station Tasks
Sound boxes (Elkonin): Push chips per phoneme — bridges to spelling
Phoneme blending chains: Oral only — increasingly long and complex words
Evidence-based math intervention strategies, number sense development, data-driven grouping tools, and station design resources for SMI specialists at GES.
The SMI Role in Station Teaching
The SMI specialist leads targeted math intervention at Station C, working with students who have not yet responded to core Reveal Math instruction. SMI instruction is systematic, explicit, and rooted in the science of math learning — it goes beyond reteaching the same lesson and targets the foundational skills (number sense, place value, operations fluency) that make grade-level learning possible.
Core principle: Math intervention works best when it is connected to — not separate from — grade-level content. SMI works with the AAPS and SPED teachers to ensure students at each tier receive the right dose of instruction at the right level.
The GES MTSS framework: how data-driven decisions, tiered intervention, and co-teaching connect to support every Grizzly.
MTSS at GES — The Big Picture
MTSS is the framework that organizes all of GES's support services — AAPS, SPED, SLI, SMI, MLL, and school counseling — into a coherent, data-driven system. Station teaching is the primary delivery vehicle for MTSS at GES: it allows all three tiers of support to happen simultaneously within the classroom, rather than pulling students out of core instruction.
The key question MTSS answers: "How do we make sure every student gets what they need, when they need it, from the person best positioned to deliver it?"
The Three Tiers — GES Implementation
TIER 3 — Intensive Individualized Intervention
~5% of students · SPED, AAPS intensive · daily monitoring · IEP or intensive plan
TIER 2 — Strategic Small-Group Intervention
~15% of students · AAPS, SLI, SMI, MLL · bi-weekly monitoring · validated programs
TIER 1 — High-Quality Core Instruction for All
~80–85% of students · grade-level teacher + all co-teachers · 3x/year screening · Reveal Math + CKLA
MTSS Core Components at GES
📊 Universal Screening
Who: All students, 3x per year (Fall · Winter · Spring)
ELA tools: DIBELS (ORF, NWF, PSF, LNF), CKLA unit assessments and skills checks
Math tools: easyCBM, Reveal Math "Are You Ready?" benchmarks
Purpose: Identify students who may need Tier 2 support — not diagnose
📈 Progress Monitoring
Who: Students receiving Tier 2 or Tier 3 intervention